Family Medicine Associate 15 Walnut S. Hamilton Ma

Yous know virtually how individuals gain control of the power of the Land and and so abuse that power similar former Usa President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some Us businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious earth security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush-league Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to bring together the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could exist deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all call up that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this twenty-four hour period.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came nigh as a result of the interaction of 3 completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, peculiarly nutrition and sanitation. The event cannot be owing to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself non to have:

Pocket-size Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and information technology did kill people long ago.

This was particularly the instance when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'south first park congenital later rich feared affliction spread from slums Britain The Contained By Andy McSmith Fri 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the Land would go on them safe from the threat of affliction.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could reach this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth merely the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" all the same contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Britain, U.s., Sweden.

Now you tin read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- United kingdom, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more than people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the illness dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells united states. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Metropolis of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester'southward approach besides cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book every bit .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Menses.	Modest-Pox.  Cases	Small-scale-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	i,355	96	7.1
British Regular army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	eleven.one
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	viii.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.one

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, then that they may be compared either style with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Regal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would accept soared with a corresponding result—but on the reverse side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Modest-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the budgeted flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the influenza vaccine, yous might exist wondering where the thought of vaccination got its commencement. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavor to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Nigh present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a uncomplicated country dr. and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening affliction of that time – smallpox, or equally it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an 8-twelvemonth erstwhile boy named James Phipps to examination his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'due south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's easily. The boy came down with a slight fever, just nothing more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should take resulted in a full-diddled, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once again; once again, naught. [1]

Edward Jenner'southward idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Every bit the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly serpent-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a uncomplicated and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" take been saved.[2]

Simply legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a conventionalities, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small-scale amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western globe by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the practice of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would exercise better confronting the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable fourth dimension and identify in the futurity.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically expert. Simply considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an functioning that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[iii] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, just there was withal an estimated 2-5% that died equally a result.[4,5] Nonetheless, this was an comeback compared to a twenty-25% mortality charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the departure in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner surround than the bulk of lodge?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and plant that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious illness, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practise of Inoculation obviously tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contamination, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amongst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-sometime male child named James Phipps. He took disease thing that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He afterward deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox as a exam to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with simply rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the apply of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Md-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-size-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report just decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession equally the respond to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical community connected to embrace Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were all the same dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the terminate of the yr 1799. A calendar month after it was inoculated with modest-pox affair without outcome, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-scale-pox and died. 2. A woman-retainer to Mr. Chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual mode from milking. Vii years later on she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. three and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summertime of 1804. Both contracted small-scale-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'south proper noun was curtained. 14. The kid of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-scale-pox a year subsequently vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living upwardly to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Another commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination past the most skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly groovy.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people notwithstanding could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the exercise.[13]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a medico to accept spoken out against it equally Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could likewise exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, two [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub about the minor-pox. It broke out with the neat epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had modest-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, just fell upon swell numbers.[fourteen]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical exercise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the real small-pox afterward, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine fabric was the "humanized" class, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, only as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and at that place were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine fabric came from cows, Jenner actually believed the fabric originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would result in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a homo who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a moo-cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the sometime practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Non only was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were also reports of deaths from other causes before long after vaccination. For example, a peel condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "small-scale-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of four months; i cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; ii good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged ten weeks, and the son of a saccharide baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Considering arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Merely facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Every bit it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the virtually severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no outcome at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

By this signal, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were so fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent md of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made by vaccinators. Immense financial proceeds combined with the force of law created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 solitary they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get most a quarter meg. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has always a dishonest remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. All the same, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A nifty pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war there were twenty-three thousand four hundred and sixty-9 cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and xc-ii pocket-sized-pox patients in London hospitals, half dozen one thousand eight hundred and fifty-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Federal republic of germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one meg vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the regime and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the nifty demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'southward government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilise of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Hither is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a menstruation of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safety procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than i,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph ii: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the stop of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its grapheme. After the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a illness that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that simply killed anywhere from one in 50 and later to as low as i in 380. The affliction could notwithstanding kill, but having become so much milder, information technology was ofttimes mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was unremarkably at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was effectually twenty%, as it had been historically. The table as well showed that after 1896 the expiry rate cruel off quickly, starting with half dozen% in 1897 to every bit low every bit 0.26% by 1908. As the balmy class of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this fourth dimension, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because information technology frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced footling in the manner of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major event, the exercise of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the final smallpox death in the The states in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of ix children in which 2 died of a skin status due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between one in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to twoscore%.[35] However, they acknowledged that about cases were not reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this result of vaccination. There were besides an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned time there had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox decease in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there accept been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected past his military father after the father was vaccinated. Afterward a prolonged access, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even higher. This report just examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the The states. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-care organization, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire earth?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which one time had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps agape that if we did the accident of some time to come epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the concurrently our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as about the only medically promoted mode to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. K. Oliphant, K.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the commodity on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to pocket-size pox. Dr. Roth kickoff claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable equally a condom in small-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterwards breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic handling died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[forty]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the disease. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Over again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other blazon of vinegar should be used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Whatsoever person who has been exposed need have no fright of smallpox if he volition take two or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or four times a day." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem light-headed, but only considering most people have been conditioned to have the age-quondam prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or merely an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, basic, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar property cells together and, as a issue, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex'south Higher, described the poor nutrition of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, java, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates information technology. This is washed downward with copious librations of stiff java, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, under a scorching lord's day, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases equally those killed in battle.[44] For example, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common crusade of death, with the infamous diseases such equally smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for simply a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted merely for i percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows u.s. a unlike reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche every bit something to protect someone from an affliction. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective culling methods of sanitation, diet, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective retention. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's bang-up discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the mantle has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a expert idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Dr., Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'southward Mag and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'southward Rooms, Gloucester, Jan 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Human action of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brownish, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present Country of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of applied medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
xviii.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the Usa," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. l-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, Feb x, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Grand. W. Harman, Medico, "A Physician'due south Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
thirty.J. Due west. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Wellness, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. xvi, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Blazon of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states of america," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, West.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Printing, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Flim-flam, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. one, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Preclude Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. 6, no. i, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Section of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January iv to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

holidayprinfordied.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post